2011-07-31

David Myatt - I've got your 'numinosity' right here!


Thulien Zo'ra has a word that describes the aggressive qualities of our Folk: "Ro'ta'fa'vo". 

Ro'ta'fa'vo is the essence of the Life-Force... One either struggles to survive and evolve or one becomes extinct. There is no other option.

There are those who think that Life is divided into the Spiritual and the Material. There is no such division. The H'si animates the physical body. Without the Material World the H'si has no meaning and cannot exist. Therefore, when people talk about the "numinous way", indicating a division between the Spiritual and the Material, it is basically nonsense. As Benito Mussolini so aptly put it, "Without the community nothing human or spiritual can exist." Because a Table of Values hangs over every people and it makes them who and what they are. Without a community, traditions, culture, etc., you cannot exist as an individual... (An individual what?)

At the end of your life you cease to exist. There is no concrete evidence (or proof) of any continuance into eternity. That is "snake oil" - the "cure for what ails you". Only a fool, or a dreamer, would count on something that cannot be proved one way or another. Such as Heaven, or winning the Lottery, or the Publisher's Clearing House Sweepstakes... Try telling your creditors that you will pay them just as soon as you win the Lottery. 

"But Jesus, or Mohamed, or Moses, or some guy down at the car wash said that there is 'eternal life'..."

Is that supposed to be funny? 

Friedrich Nietzsche summed it up very nicely: "All of that Abrahamic twaddle is the product of a slave mentality." Inversely, if you believe that shit you will wind up a slave. (Abrahamic = Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Atheism - it's all mindless twaddle.)

"I've got your "numinosity" right here," he said, grasping his genitals.

A case in point is David Myatt:

"Over the past decade there has been, for me, a complete change of perspective, for I have gone from upholding and violently propagating the racialism of National-Socialism – and encouraging the overthrow of the existing status quo through revolutionary insurrection – to the acceptance of empathy and compassion, and to that gentle, quiet, desire to cease to cause suffering, which form the basis for what I have called The Numinous Way, with this Numinous Way being apolitical, undogmatic, and considering both race and “the folk” as unethical abstractions which move us away from empathy and compassion and which thus obscure our true human nature."

BOLLIX! David Myatt is obviously insane! He cannot throw the work and sacrifices of MILLIONS of Aryans down the toilet and then turn around and call himself "empathetic" and "compassionate" - that is pure bullshit. "Human Nature"? Nothing alien is human to me. It's pure rubbish!

If you are ready to lay down and die just skip all the sanctimonious bullshit and lay down and die! But if you are ready to live then join the Community and fight for its survival and continued evolution!

That's what I think....

2011-07-30

News Flashes From Around the World

LIBYA -  NATO's cowardice is apparent and disturbing; attacking a defenseless nation with high flying airplanes, missiles launched from sea, and helicopter gunships spraying missiles and bullets. Acting as a protectorate to prevent slaughter, NATO has augmented the killing, behaving as a killing machine with no other objective than to destroy. Arguments between the European nations and the United States reveal that NATO has run out of ammunition and needs more armaments . According to the Daily Mail, The U.S. as of June 11, has spent $665 million in the conflict.

Insidious spread of far-right thoughts 
The shooting rampage in Norway last Friday reflects the surging far-right sentiment in Europe. The shooting was not carried out on a whim. Anders Behring Breivik, who carried out the worst massacre in Norway since World War II, had reportedly been planning the killing for nine years.

Washington's three-ring circus
It shouldn't be surprising to those of us who physically restrain our gag reflex and endeavour to observe or participate in the American political spectacle that a trending topic on Twitter this past weekend was the combination of a four-letter word, the word "you" and "Washington".

Fighting back against the CIA drone war 
They call it "bug splat", the splotch of blood, bones, and viscera that marks the site of a successful drone strike. To those manning the consoles in Nevada, it signifies "suspected militants" who have just been "neutralised"; to those on the ground, in most cases, it represents a family that has been shattered, a home destroyed.

America's own Taliban
Prior to 9/11, the Taliban government in Afghanistan did not register very much on American radar screens, with one notable exception: when it blew up two colossal images of the Buddha in Bamiyan province in early 2001. But destruction of treasured artifacts isn't just limited to the Taliban.

Palestinians Prepare for Massive Uprising
Leading members of the Palestinian Popular Committees in the West Bank plan massive civil unrest and disobedience against the Israeli occupation authorities come September when the Palestinians take their case for statehood to the UN.

Does the United States control the weather?
Here is your key to understanding HAARP (weather modification), with enough references to keep you busy for awhile.

Biological Evolution
In a fascinating discovery that counters a common theory that human evolution has slowed to a crawl or even stopped in modern humans, a recent study examining data from an international genomics project describes the past 40,000 years as a time of supercharged evolutionary change, driven by exponential population growth and cultural shifts.

Soviet Union came close to defeat in World War II
A film banned by the Kremlin and kept secret for more than 40 years has provided an insight into the wartime exploits of Marshal Georgy Zhukov, the military commander who led the fight against Hitler, and how close the Soviet Union came to defeat.

Dissension in the Movement



The internal and eternal bickering within the Movement is the result of a failure to understand the ideology of National Socialism. "Mein Ehre Heisst Treue." (My honor is loyalty.) Rats have no honor and no loyalty to anyone other than themselves. They are not trying to win the struggle. Their aims are a lot lower than that. They want to glorify themselves at the expense of the Movement.

Let us assess the situation logically and without preconceived notions. Our goals should be: 1.)- The survival and continued evolution of the Folkish Community; 2.)- The creation of a fighting organization that can build a United Front against the Enemy, and thwart his plans to destroy us; 3.)- The identification of our enemies as well as our friends; 4.)- The unification and coordination of a common Folkish ideology; 5.)- The propagation of the Folkish ideology among potential recruits; 6.)- The intake and indoctrination of said recruits; 7.)- Developing a strategy to win the struggle; 8.)- Developing tactics to win the battles that must be fought... etc., etc.

Are there agent-provocateurs and misleaders among our ranks? If there are they must be identified and neutralized. What would these Enemy agents do to disrupt our activities? They would spread gossip about the Movement's leadership, and lies about our goals. They would try to make us look like idiots to potential recruits to our Movement. They would attempt to neutralize the gains that we make and advocate courses of action that are counter-productive to progress. And, of course, the agents of the tyrant are the first to create dissension by casting aspersions on the abilities, motives, morality and actions of others.

Lead, follow, or get out of the way! Or, as Theodor Eicke so poetically put it, "Get in line, shut your mouth and do your job." The task ahead of us is monumental. Therefore, we must be totally focused on our goals to the exclusion of all the petty bullshit. You want to gossip, go play bingo with all the Yentas at the Jewish Community Center. Aryans don't gossip.

How do we know if a Leader is for real? Why that's a "no brainer" - a Leader leads.

Why should we always be so damned paranoid? Screw the System and all of its minions! The System can't find its ass with both hands. Sure, it is good at psy-ops - like getting you to believe that you have reason to be paranoid - but when it comes right down to it, every last Government employee is sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States, and defend it from enemies both foreign and domestic. Don't kid yourself, your pitiful efforts to change society are not a threat to the United States. Only in your dreams.

And, here is another truth worth considering: I don't give a rat's ass if you are a Jew, or a sex pervert, or a worshipper of Satan, or have a black grandmother, or are from Mars - if you are willing to commit yourself to the goals of the Folkish Community then you are OK as far as I am concerned. I'm not going to turn away anybody who wants to help us win the struggle for survival and continued evolution. That would be just plain stupid.

If you are afraid then go ahead and barricade yourself in your bunker. Only remember, we have the right to survival and continued evolution. It is guaranteed under the United Nations Charter. And, even if it wasn't it is a fundamental Law of Nature. We should not apologize to anyone for being ourselves. We are who and what we are and that's they way it is. Anybody who can't live with that is welcome to make their move.

Lots of promising individuals have squandered themselves needlessly. This has to stop. The first step is to bring our ideology up to date, the next is to build a fighting organization, then we can take our message to our people. Study history. The National Socialist German Worker's Party was the product of many different organizations... with many strong leaders... Adolf Hitler was astute enough to put it all together... The "Leader Mystique" came after the organization of the Movement into a political party. It was the same in the revolutions in China and Viet Nam. "Which came first the chicken or the egg?" is a rhetorical question - we know which came first it was the egg! Chickens don't appear out of thin air. And neither do political parties.

In order to build something real with what we have, we need to realize that we are not individuals but members of the Folkish Community. Our wants and needs must be subordinated to the goals of the Folkish Community. We must cast our egos aside, and regard one another as "Comrades" in the struggle for the survival and continued evolution of the Folkish Community.

If you think about it, it is really simple: We either all hang together or we all hang separately! (Thank you Ben Franklin for that one.)

2011-07-29

What is 'National Socialism'?

What is National Socialism?

"National" means "Of or relating to a nation; common to or characteristic of a whole nation." In this case National Socialism would be translated to "American Socialism" as opposed to "International" Socialism. Which doesn't really exist anyway.

Socialism is an economic and political system where the use of property and capital (money) is used for the common good. According to socialists, the wealth of a society should be shared, and everyone in it shall have everything they need. The common good comes before the individual good. Although socialist ideas go back in history to Plato, the word socialism was first used in Britain in the 1820's. Louis Blanc described socialism as being “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”

Almost every prospering country in the world is a Socialist country.

"But but but," you say, "Socialism is bad - It infringes on my civil liberties!" You could say that but I would just say, "Shut the fuck up!"

In those countries they have legal use of pot, everyone has the same rights and privileges, they have paid vacations, free health care, maternity leave is six months, better roads and rail systems, and people employers (most of them at least) will let employees clock in for 2 hours a day to get paid while at the gym.

Now, why is this bad? I think that Americans have been tricked by Corporate Capitalism. We have been tricked into believing that the politicians are fighting for the interests of the people when they are actually fighting for big business, and believe me, people and business are two very very different things.

"Socialism" is an economic system with which the means of production are owned and controlled collectively - by the people. The goal of socialism is to obtain equal distribution of wealth. This implies the abolition of a class hierarchy, and the abolition of the social parasite.

When I say that most Americans are in fact "socialists", I do not mean that they are conspiring to overthrow class hierarchy, and actively seek to abolish the concept of selfishness. When I say that most Americans, including contemporary Republicans, are socialists, I mean to say that they wholeheartedly support the equal redistribution of wealth. Abolishing class hierarchy and the social parasite is simply a logical progression from this.

Socialism does not mean violence. It does not mean dictatorship. It quite simply is adequately explained by "equal distribution of wealth." Marxism, Communism, Nazism, and Fascism are all socialist movements - but to be a socialist does not imply you are a Marxist, communist, Nazi, or fascist.

The easiest way to prove that most Americans are in fact socialists is to cite one example that is unequivocally socialist: welfare. Most Americans today would be hard-pressed to say that they would want to completely ban welfare, and thus, this is why they are socialist. Welfare, in its most reduced definition, is when the Government imposes taxation on the "haves" to give to the "have nots". This is called "redistribution of wealth". You, as an American citizen, have no choice but to give money to the impoverished.

Perhaps you think this is a good thing - and that would make you a socialist.

Most people, who profess to be Christian, believe that helping those in need should be mandatory. That is why our taxes go to welfare. The reason we rely on the Government to help those in need is because "the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak." Most people would rather use any extra money they have to pursue those things that are unhealthy, and even downright evil... rather than to make sure that some homeless person gets a square meal.

Maybe you are thinking that surely people would gladly, and voluntarily, give 10% of their income to those in need. I say, Bollix! The majority of our good "Christian" citizens don't give a damn about anybody but themselves. That is why the Government has to force people to contribute to society through taxation. It should be mandatory to help your fellow American. Because if people weren't forced to help others, than people who need help would not get it.

Oddly enough, the people who believe that people will help others of "their own free will" are the ones who are the most selfish, while people who believe that we must be forced to help others are the ones who are compassionate. Because the reality is that without social welfare programs the "have nots" would soon stage a revolution against the "haves". And, this is avoided by throwing them a few crumbs off the table.

Capitalism has earned a bad reputation over the years. It is a selfish and exploitative system. The whole idea of Capitalism is that through selfishness, society as a whole, and people in general, will benefit more than under any other economic system. The core teaching of capitalism is: Profits before people! In other words, those who really benefit are the rich, who become richer. Theoretically, the crumbs off the rich man's table will "trickle down" to the floor where the poor will hungrily lap them up.

There is nothing more degrading than crawling around the floor lapping up the leavings of the wealthy. There is no worse opinion of humanity than the one that capitalism implies.

And, that's the Truth!

2011-07-26

Anders Behring Breivik


Whatever else it was, the rampage in Norway was not the work of Islamic terrorists.

That speculation, ubiquitous in the hours that immediately followed the massive explosion in downtown Oslo, ended with the arrest of Anders Behring Breivik as he was gunning down scores of youngsters, execution-style, at an island retreat.

Since then, the world has learned a great deal about who Breivik is, down to the quotidian details of his schooling, his farm, his parents' divorce and his regular Sunday lunches with his mother. The more important question — and the one that so far has been mainly misdiagnosed — is: What is Breivik?

Perhaps because he shows no obvious signs of mental illness, the media has alighted on a political answer. Besides being an "ethnic Norwegian," Breivik is a "Christian," a "gun enthusiast,"and a "right-wing nationalist" whose views, according to Time magazine, "recall neo-Nazi politics." In an interview Breivik conducted with himself as part of his 1,500-page manifesto, "2083: A European Declaration of Independence," he speaks of his pride in his "Viking heritage," says he belongs to "an Indigenous Rights Movement" and insists that he will not "accept an Islamic presence in Europe."

In short, a "right-wing extremist".

That he no doubt is. Yet there are a lot of right-wing extremists out there, many of whom entertain views far more extreme than Breivik's, including on the subject of Islam. They typically do not take it upon themselves to go on murderous rampages. Nor will it do to say that because Breivik read this or that blog, or admired this or that author, that those blogs or authors are complicit in his crime. Breivik's parting shot on Twitter was to quote John Stuart Mill. Will the greatest champion of civil liberties now be in bad ideological odor, too?

The more telling side of Breivik's manifesto is his self-description as "Justiciar Knight Commander for the Knights Templar of Europe," a group he claims has some 80 members and held a secret meeting in London in 2002. The fetishistic medievalism — Breivik seems to have designed a military dress uniform, and wants to wear it to his trial — is significant: Like Osama bin Laden and his epigones, his worldview seems mainly defined by the politics of the 13th century. And that worldview is fundamentally geared toward hastening an apocalypse.

What do all of those who use terror, to get their point across, have in common (Christian, Marxist, Islamist, Nazi, environmentalist and so on)? They have been denied the right to be heard. They have no forum where they can discuss their views. And this has created a situation where, out of sheer desperation, these men have been forced to resort to violence. It is happening all over the world. Even in the United States where free speech is guaranteed by the Constitution.

If your views are controversial you are marginalized, and denied access to a public forum.

Many active cataclysmic apocalypticists, believe that the socio-political world is in huge tension, like tectonic plates about to crack, and if they can set off a small explosion in the right place it will unleash far greater forces. In this sense, the thing they resemble most is the people they hate.

They're right, and not just in regards to methods. Just as al Qaeda's primary fury has always been directed at Muslims who they view as apostates, traitors or stooges of the West, the main object of Breivik's hatred was what he called the "cultural Marxists" who dominated Norwegian politics. "If they refuse to listen there will be no turning back. We will eventually wipe out every single one of them."

Similarly, the purpose of Breivik's massacre wasn't simply to kill off the Labor party's leadership, current and future. It was to create a spectacle, and in doing so energize a cause. It's no accident that he wants media present at his trial: He has now entered what he calls the propaganda phase of his campaign, in which he imagines he will be given "a stage to the world" through which he can win over "tens of millions of European sympathizers and tens of thousands of brothers and sisters who support us fully and are willing to fight beside us." This was precisely what al Qaeda hoped to achieve (and to an extent did achieve) with 9/11.

On Friday morning Breivik wrote "Today you will become immortal." He seems to have meant it literally. Whatever else might be said of that particular longing, it can hardly be called religious (what then would be the point of an afterlife?), or Christian (murdering children en masse is not a tenet of any Christian faith), or conservative (a political tendency that is fundamentally anti-utopian).

It is the belief that all manner of redemptive possibilities lie on just the other side of a crucible of unspeakable chaos and suffering. At his arrest, Breivik called his acts "atrocious but necessary." Stalin and other Marxists so despised by Breivik might have said the same thing about party purges or the liquidation of the kulaks. 

These are the politics that have largely defined our age. CIA assassinations, Hitler, Stalin, Mao Tse-tung, etc... Nothing new here. As the world population grows the value of life proportionally declines. Until, like China, we can execute men and women by the thousands and televise the event for all to see.

After all, we see scores of people die everyday courtesy of the "Entertainment Industry". As a result, we have become immune to human suffering.

Norway, Europe and probably the U.S. will now have anxious debates about xenophobia, populism and the rise of neo-Fascism. These are worthy topics, but they are incidental to understanding what happened on Friday. What we witnessed was the irruption of an impulse — more psychological than political — that defines a broader swath of the ideological spectrum than most people would care to acknowledge. As for Breivik, there ought to be no question as to what he is: A voice crying in the wilderness. That has been denied the basic right to be heard. 

In a world of 8 Billion there are millions more like Breivik - who are fed up with the System and are past the point of caring about their own safety.

Be afraid, be very afraid....

2011-07-25

Gay Couples Wed Across New York


Amidst flag waving, thousands of colored balloons, and brass bands hundreds of homosexuals have been joined in "Holy Matrimony" in New York after it became the sixth and most populous state in the US to recognise same-sex unions as legal.

Newly-weds brandished their marriage certificates and clicked champagne glasses together as ceremonies were held from Manhattan to Niagara Falls.

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who had pushed for the gay marriage law to be adopted, was officiating at the marriage of two male colleagues in his official mayoral residence.

He told ABC television he thought gay marriage would take off across the US "simply because of the economics and the young people" who would gain more influence on politics in years to come.

"Nothing is ever 100% but this is a trend that's going, and it's going to grow very rapidly, partially because New York is such a bellwether and so visible."

Civil rights activists argue the US Congress should now repeal a federal law defining marriage as only existing between a man and a woman.

Meanwhile, Christians everywhere are shocked...

The National Organization for Marriage held rallies in New York City, Albany, Rochester and Buffalo on Sunday, accusing Mr Cuomo and lawmakers of redefining marriage without consulting voters.

Protesters chanted "Let the People Vote!" at the rallies.

A march against gay marriage in New York city, 24 July Some protesters in New York city brandished Bibles

A gathering in New York City that started with several hundred people opposite Mr Cuomo's Manhattan office quickly swelled to thousands.

They waved signs saying "Excommunicate Cuomo" and "God cannot be mocked".

"I'm worried that the younger generations will think this is normal, and it's not," said Gloria Sanchez, 35, of Brooklyn. "It's wrong. It's a sin."

Outside the capitol in Albany, about 400 people gathered in a park under a banner reading "Marriage(equals)Man and Woman", topped with a "Don't Tread on Me" flag.

Silly people. God has been mocked and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it. They've been teaching that being Gay is "normal" in our schools for years. Or, did all this come as a complete surprise? This is your Government at work. This is what the United States of America stands for. This is your Future! Your grandchildren are going to be queer and your race is going to be bred out of existence. How do you like them apples?

You made your bed and now you have to lie in it!

Tweedledum and Tweedledee


The Democrats and Republicans are two heads on the same Corporate Capitalist monster.

There is no appreciable difference between the two parties. The Two Party System is a hoax designed to mislead the American voter.

We constantly hear about "Liberals" and "Conservatives"... it's just the same old noise. Much ado about nothing. The bottom line is: Politicians are full of shit, and anyone who believes them is a moron.

We have no need of liars and idiots. Therefore we can do very nicely without liberals and conservatives, Republicans and Democrats - the Two Party System is bullshit, plain and simple. If you believe in fairy tales there is no room for you in our Movement.

"How can we have a mass movement without letting everyone in?"

Mass movement? You've gotta be kidding. The masses are asses and corporate boot-lickers, nothing more. Doesn't anyone remember that Al Gore won the popular vote and lost the election? Corporate Capitalism is NEVER going to let us win an election. Fine, there are other roads to power...

Our way is to unplug ourselves from the Corporate Capitalist bullshit machine and start living our own dream. The System is going to collapse all by itself. Wait and see. All we have to do is bide our time and eliminate our weaknesses. When the time comes we will be ready.

Our biggest challenge is to keep from laughing out loud when these idiots start talking their crazy bullshit. Bending our ear with the latest conspiracy theory. Telling us that there is a difference between Republicans and Democrats... If there is I can't see it. They both have the same agenda: Kiss the corporate ass; make lots of money; destroy the environment; wreck our country; support Israel; and enslave the American worker.

How can anyone, in good conscience, vote for either Tweedledum or Tweedledee?